It’s time for the post-party debrief. Sometimes it happens just before going to bed, sometimes the next morning when you wake up. Everyone has their own version of the night, their highlights, their lows, or their track IDs.

There’s the one who spent most of the night talking in the smoking area. The one who only knows that it was good, but can’t really explain why. The one who left before everyone else. The one who danced to their three favourite tracks of the moment. The one still looking for the ID of the track that made them leave the bar queue. And the one who was annoyed by everything.

We all have different reasons for deciding whether a night was good or bad.

When I talk with my closest friends — the ones I’ve spent countless nights with in clubs, festivals and afterparties — I realise that we have almost never loved or hated a night for the same reasons.

This is what interests me today as a journalist: the almost total subjectivity of this scene, from the track itself to the overall experience.

A night out is unstable by definition. It depends on too many variables: the time we arrive, where we stand in the room (front left or nothing), the person we run into, our mental state, what we consume, or simply what we carry with us when we walk into the club.

Two people can spend the same hour in front of the same DJ and walk away with completely incompatible stories.

So what are we really evaluating when we say that a night was good?

Of course, some things can be measured, and these are the aspects we should be uncompromising about. Sound quality, waiting times, safety. These are elements that organisers can control beforehand and that create the baseline for what we would call a “good” or a “bad” night.

Once that foundation is in place, everyone is free to experience the night in their own way. But that assumes everyone enters the party under the same conditions.

And we don’t.

We are not equal at the threshold of a club or a festival. For some people, the experience starts much earlier. It begins in the queue, in the gaze of the door staff, in a search that feels more thorough than the one given to others.

Racialised people often describe the stress of the entrance, repeated checks, absurd suspicions, or that phrase thrown to security: “the dealer is Black.” Suddenly, a body becomes suspicious by default. For these people, the night already starts under tension.

Some women also arrive dressed for public transport and change clothes once they have passed security. It’s a strategy learned and passed down over time. Adjusting appearance to avoid comments, refusals, intrusive stares, or worse. Here again, the party begins with an unsolicited negotiation.

And when the night ends, it is often women who have to anticipate the journey home. Changing clothes again, sharing their location, trying not to fall asleep in a taxi, walking quickly with keys between their fingers. While some simply go home tired, others go home alert and cautious.

So no, we are not experiencing the same night.

What deeply moved one person may have left someone else completely indifferent. What felt like the moment for one person may have been just a transition for another.

We also tend to forget that parties are retold afterwards. We reconstruct them, and above all we give them coherence, a meaning. Sometimes we even make them better than they really were, because we want them to have been good. Because we paid a lot. Because we were paid. Because we had been waiting for that date for weeks. Because we posted a story.

Partying is an extremely unstable environment. It depends on very simple factors: the time you arrive, the fatigue accumulated during the week, the attention you give to the music, the people you are with, or even the exact spot where you stand in the room. Two people can spend an hour in front of the same DJ and leave with completely different memories.

Yet this subjective nature is rarely acknowledged in conversations about clubbing. We often talk about parties as if they could be evaluated objectively, like a concert or a performance. We compare line-ups, the length of sets, the reputation of clubs. But a night out is far less stable than that.

A large part of the experience happens in things that don’t appear on a flyer or a running order. A conversation that lasts longer than expected in the smoking area. An unexpected encounter on the dancefloor. A moment when the room seems to synchronize around a particular track. Or, on the contrary, a vague feeling of not quite finding your place in the crowd.

What complicates this evaluation even further is that the party is reconstructed afterwards. The next day, or in the days that follow, everyone tells the story of the night through their own reference points: a track, a meeting, a conversation, a moment of exhaustion, a moment of euphoria. Very quickly, the night becomes a story that feels more coherent than it actually was — partly because we want it to be.

A good night is difficult to describe.

Of course, we can talk about the sound system, the quality of the sets, the programming — everything that remains relatively measurable. But the emotions we feel belong to us. A truly great night is often a very personal experience: a moment when several elements align at the right time — the music, the energy in the room, our own state of mind — and something simply works, sometimes in a way that is hard to explain.

Saying that a night was good often means that we were available for it.

And when we say that a party was incredible, we are often talking less about the party itself than about the person we happened to be that night.


    Tagged with :